can you
manage
yourself?
Ever known an ignorant, know-
it-all boss so self-infatuated
that he or she fails to see the
surrounding realities, so the
team bombs? As Ligouri puts it,
“You cannot give what you do
not have.”
“History’s great achievers—
a Napoléon, a da Vinci, a Mozart—
have always managed themselves,”
says Peter Drucker in “Managing
Oneself” in HBR’S 10 Must-Reads: The Essentials.
Columbia College Chicago’s
Nicholson tells us that,
“According to current
leadership theory, two of the
most important functions of
the leader are structuring the
work and coaching the team
members.” Still, nobody can
perform these crucial functions
while having a meltdown.
Kitchens can be emotional
hotbeds for everyone, says
Kleiman. “Employees can be
full of fear concerning possible
job loss or lack of necessary
skills. And apathy can kill
a kitchen in which there is
little or no opportunity for
advancement,” he says, adding
anger and aggression to his list
of common emotions that can
be hotter than our stoves. Chefs
must successfully regulate
their own emotions before they
can lead.
Johnson advises leaders to hold
back from decision-making in
the heat of the moment. Instead
of plunging forward, he suggests
leaders take a step back (at least
24 to 72 hours, depending on
the circumstances), taking due
diligence to assess. This
often leads to better relationships
and more positive results.
While fear of the chef no longer
motivates employees to toe the
line, today’s culinary leaders
must know themselves, human
nature, and their industry and
craft. “Employees want a positive
work environment and room
for growth and advancement,”
Ligouri says. “My research
shows that culinary professionals
want feedback and recognition.
They also want to be respected
and trusted. Money is not a
primary motivator.”
True leaders are not infallible,
invincible knights in shining
armor or arrogant know-it-alls
who act like tantrum-throwing
children. “Calling someone
an idiot because he or she
doesn’t know how to grind
up fenugreek seeds is not
leadership,” Kleiman says.
Ethel Hammer is a writer, lecturer
and cartoonist based in Chicago.
followers have
power, too
managing
your mon y
NEXT
ISSUE
While America romances
leadership, the role of followers
is just as crucial and far
more important than most
people think, according to
Barbara Kellerman, James
MacGregor Burns Lecturer in
Public Leadership at Harvard
University’s John F. Kennedy
School of Government,
Cambridge, Mass.
In the You Tube video, “Barbara
Kellerman on Followership,”
Kellerman identifies these five
types of followers—who have
the power to be agents of
change—based on their “level of
engagement”:
Isolates: Totally
detached people who
strengthen leaders by
their nonengagement.
Bystanders: Passive
followers who deliberately
withdraw and therefore
wind up supporting the
status quo.
Participants: Engaged
people who invest their
energy in their leaders,
either by following or
defying them.
Activists: Invigorated
people who try to help or
weaken—or even depose—
their leaders.
Diehards: Impassioned
souls who, if necessary,
will “die for their cause,”
making sacrifices either
for or against their leaders.